DarqMime
Full Member
*silence*
Posts: 147
|
Post by DarqMime on Jan 13, 2010 17:01:40 GMT -5
H&C, one possibility for the Mind Control today is to force someone to claim Reverse Tracker, and say they targeted get_1 last night. Then include that they got results of Wade Wilson and SomeOtherPlayer. The person we force could then say that if Wade admits to trying to kill get, this means the other player must be Blaine.
Hopefully we could get a DayKill user to waste a power.
|
|
|
Post by HavokAndSapien on Jan 13, 2010 17:18:04 GMT -5
Sounds good, any idea who to frame on that?
|
|
DarqMime
Full Member
*silence*
Posts: 147
|
Post by DarqMime on Jan 13, 2010 17:27:48 GMT -5
Well, we'd have to control someone who hasn't posted yet. Maybe Quebbster? Goodman?
Framing wise, I'm thinking charlesx
|
|
|
Post by HavokAndSapien on Jan 13, 2010 17:36:57 GMT -5
So wait if Blaine is a busdriver wouldn't that mess the results?
|
|
DarqMime
Full Member
*silence*
Posts: 147
|
Post by DarqMime on Jan 13, 2010 17:41:11 GMT -5
Nope, think of it this way:
Busdriver targets A & B
Vig and RT target A
They then target B
Reverse Tracker would still get Vig and Busdriver as targeting Player B.
Can't use Quebbs now...
|
|
|
Post by HavokAndSapien on Jan 13, 2010 17:48:16 GMT -5
How about this:
"I may have something that is useful. Without giving out excat details, I have Wade and charlesx targeting get_1 last night. So therefore if get_1 was busdriven and we believe Wade that makes charlesx Blaine. I believe you have some explaining to do.
Vote: charlesx"
Sound good?
|
|
DarqMime
Full Member
*silence*
Posts: 147
|
Post by DarqMime on Jan 13, 2010 17:51:40 GMT -5
That sounds perfect! Now who should say it... The BoyBlunder?
|
|
DarqMime
Full Member
*silence*
Posts: 147
|
Post by DarqMime on Jan 13, 2010 17:55:46 GMT -5
Actually, maybe someone who isn't too chatty, so their additional silence doesn't arouse suspicion.
We'll also need to provide them a roleclaim if need be. Deadshot from Be Your Own Bad Guy was a reverse tracker.
|
|
|
Post by HavokAndSapien on Jan 13, 2010 17:58:48 GMT -5
How about mbauers? And I was thinking we leave out the role and character this time just so it doesn't look get's post from yesterday, especially for when he gets on explains he was forced to say that.
|
|
DarqMime
Full Member
*silence*
Posts: 147
|
Post by DarqMime on Jan 13, 2010 18:00:44 GMT -5
Right, but you control them all day, right? Not just one post?
|
|
|
Post by HavokAndSapien on Jan 13, 2010 18:10:33 GMT -5
I am not sure, it would seem that way from the role though. I asked Mags and here is the exact pm I sent in.
(Ok lets have mbauers post this and then nothing against it including changing his vote:
"I may have something that is useful. Without giving out excat details, I have Wade and charlesx targeting get_1 last night. So therefore if get_1 was busdriven and we believe Wade that makes charlesx Blaine. I believe you have some explaining to do.
Vote: charlesx"
and just to clarify can I have him make more posts later in the day?)
|
|
DarqMime
Full Member
*silence*
Posts: 147
|
Post by DarqMime on Jan 13, 2010 19:22:11 GMT -5
So Dax is definitely claiming as Lantern Prime.
|
|
DarqMime
Full Member
*silence*
Posts: 147
|
Post by DarqMime on Jan 13, 2010 19:28:42 GMT -5
H&C, you may need to send a clarification PM reading something like,
"Just to be make sure it's correct
Change Vote: charlesx"
(since he's already voted for get_1)
|
|
|
Post by HavokAndSapien on Jan 13, 2010 21:48:21 GMT -5
So mbauers defense of why get was driven makes me think they are both mafia.
|
|
DarqMime
Full Member
*silence*
Posts: 147
|
Post by DarqMime on Jan 13, 2010 22:36:15 GMT -5
Same here, and what I was hoping for. The fact get isn't VEHEMENTLY defending himself screams mafia.
|
|